Systematic Covered Writing

 . . . more than just covered calls . . .

TELK and Market Issues

THE DATE: November 16, 2006

THE STOCK: Telik Inc. - This biopharmaceutical company works to discover, develop and commercialize innovative small molecule drugs to treat diseases.

THE STRATEGY: The Buy Back & Roll Out strategy is used to increase the amount of cash the position has generated.

THE COMMENTARY: What should a writer do with current TELK positions?  This is a tough question to answer as the Bid and Ask for various strike prices, particularly for January 2007, contain an unusual amount of extrinsic value.  For example, positions can be established in November 2006, with the same premium as was available in January 2006.  Keep in mind, this is with the stock trading at about the same price.

This is VERY unusual.  The writer's guess is there is a lot of Phase Three drug trial 'hype' being built into the options.  Please note that the writer does not profess to know one way or the other, but obviously something is brewing over the next couple of months.  Now, add to the mix that in November, one of the analyst that follow this stock downgraded it, and established a new twelve month price target of $11.00!  Could he be right?  Yes, no, maybe so! Analyst have been wrong in the past, and will be wrong in the future.

Look at it this way, if he is right . . . all the investors that are buying the January call options are going to lose their . . . . (money). So . . . what should a covered writer do?  Again, there is no pat, or even correct answer to this question.  The approach the covered writer uses is based on this thought process:

  1. Make a decision based on exploring the math of being called or not called.

  2. Check to make sure the results of the decision fall within the investing guidelines established for the portfolio.

  3. Then . . . make the decision, based on the math . . . understanding the effects of the decision, over both a short, and longer term time frame.

  4. Finally, live with that decision (based on math), and don't try to second guess the transactions.  One can go 'nuts' trying to figure out the 'best' way to trade a position if should-a-would-a-could-ofs are allowed to occupy the thought process.

Having said that . . . here are the current TELK holdings in the 100k Portfolio:

      Systematic Covered Writing      
              . . . More than just covered calls . . .      
    SysCW   Position Tracker    
               
Historical Data Open Positions  
        Stock Cash Total Cash  Value as of 
Date Strategy Status Position Investment Generated Generated 22-Nov-06
10-Oct-05 Initial Stock Purchase Buy 200 TELK @ 15.5386 ($3,114.72)     $3,550.00
  Current Price $17.75 Telik, Inc.        
10-Oct-05 Initial Call Option Sell two '07 Jan $15 LEAPS 4.70   $930.46    
               
  Cash in Hand 29.87%       $930.46  
3-Mar-06 Initial Stock Purchase Buy 100 TELK @ 21.5785 ($2,164.85)     $1,775.00
  Current Price $17.75 Telik, Inc.        
3-Mar-06 Initial Call Option Sell Jan $20 call @ $7.90   $781.72    
7-Sep-06 Initial Stock Purchase Buy 200 TELK @ 17.5774 ($3,522.48)     $1,775.00
  Current Price $17.75 Telik, Inc.        
7-Sep-06 Initial Call Option Sell two Jan $17.50 calls @ 4.30   $850.47 Email 9/07  
16-Nov-06 Buy Back & Roll Out Lower Buy Jan $20 call @ 4.70   ($478.25)    
16-Nov-06 Buy Back & Roll Out Buy two Jan $17.50 calls @ 5.80   ($1,169.50)    
Combine $5,687.33 300 @ $19.08  Combined 300 Share Position        
16-Nov-06 Interim Trade Sell three '08 Jan $17.50 LEAPS @ 7.30   $2,179.18 Email 11/16  
               
  Cash in Hand 38.04%       $2,163.62  
6-Nov-06 Initial Stock Purchase Buy 100 TELK @ $18.924 ($1,899.40)     $1,775.00
  Current Price $17.75 Telik, Inc.        
6-Nov-06 Initial Call Option Sell '08 Jan $17.50 LEAP @ 7.30   $721.72 Email 11/06  
6-Nov-06     Accounting        
  Cash in Hand 38.00%       $721.72  

For the first 200 shares, the writer is ignoring the recent (November 2006) commentary from the analyst that thinks this stock is going to tank.  Way?  Because if it's trading at say $11 in January, the existing call will expire, and the writer will simply recover the position.  The stock price will end up being the stock price, and the writer is simply not going to 'worry' about it.  Note that over 29% has already been generated, which happens to be almost two years worth of the cash generating 'objective'.  The writer is thinking that TELK should be okay once the supposed 'bad news' plays out.

For the next 300 shares, the writer decided to hedge on the side of caution.  Note that two separate holdings were combined in November, with both existing  calls being closed, and replaced with the 2008 Jan $17.50 LEAP option contracts.  The 'math' says the position has generated over 38% so far, which again, fits the investment objectives. The 'thinking' goes down two paths:

  1. If the analyst is incorrect and TELK holds at the current level, it is not like something 'bad' occurs, other than the the position is already rolled to 2008.  Is it possible that a greater premium 'could have' been generated by waiting?  Yes, maybe, but remember . . . the decision was made, and a writer should cease to concern themselves with whether on not it was the best possible transaction.

  2. On the other hand, TELK could lose significant value to where there would be no way to generate the same amount of cash and remain at the $17.50 strike price.  Understand that now that this option is rolled out to January 2008, which means that where the stock is in 2007 is not a concern.  The cash has already been generated.  Again . . . this is not 'bad', but it would validate the decision to roll the position now.

It is hoped that writers realize there is no 'best' involved.  The writer is not try to make the best trade possible, but rather justify the transactions that take place based on the math involved.


For the final TELK position, the stock is already covered with a 2008 LEAP, so nothing needs to be done.  What would happen if the stock really does lose value?  One possibility would be to use the Buy Back & Lower strategy if the news is so bad that a $15 strike price seems reasonable. For the last four-hundred shares that were purchased, the writer does not want to sell the stock for less than $17.50.

How various TELK positions are traded over the next few weeks will be up to the writers.  It is suggested  what ever decision is made, that it is based on an evaluation of the math involved in the position. Other TELK activity will take place between now and January 2007.  In executing the transactions, the thought processes mentioned above will be the stimulus behind any activity.

Comments, questions and opinions are always welcome . . . rlcoveru@wavecable.com

The Covered Writer


PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS EXAMPLE IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS A RECOMMENDATION TO INVEST IN TELK STOCK OR ANY OTHER EQUITY.  THE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.  THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT SIMILAR TRANSACTIONS CAN BE EXECUTED IN THE FUTURE. INVESTING IN THE STOCK MARKET INVOLVES RISKS, DO SO ONLY WITH A KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE RISKS INVOLVED! STRATEGIES INVOLVING TAX ISSUES SHOULD BE DISCUSSED WITH YOU TAX PROFESSIONAL.

The information provided above is for informational purposes only, and no mention of a particular security constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold that or any other security, or that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. You further understand that the Covered Writer will not advise you personally concerning the nature, potential, value or suitability of any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, investment strategy or other matter. To the extent any of the information available on this website may be deemed to be investment advice, such information is impersonal and not tailored to the investment needs of any specific person. Always remember that past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance.

These are the terms of use.  Why are they here?  Because the examples provided are real.  The transactions actually took place.  The dates are real, the positions are real.  Some transactions will have been executed on the day you receive the email.  What you are agreeing to, is the fact that in no way is it being suggested that you can, or should, enter a similar position.  Why?  Because that would be providing investment advice and the Covered Writer is not authorized to do that.  There is also no guarantee that similar transactions could be executed at any time in the future. Only licensed brokers are allowed to provide investment advice.  Therefore, you are agreeing that the preceding example was provided for 'educational purposes' for the sole purpose of illustrating the Systematic Covered Writing strategies.

Thank you!

SYSTEMATIC COVERED WRITING
Copyright © 2006. All rights reserved.
Revised: 02/05/07